It's Not Bigotry. It's Biology

Race has no impact on your behavior but homosexuality is a behavior, so if he’s gonna say it’s a civil right to get married because of a particular behavior, by that same logic anybody with any behavior could claim they have a right to marry say five people. Then that is the behavior they want to engage in so that would be a civil right. 

This is very sloppy thinking to say that because somebody has a desire to marry somebody that if you deny them the right to marry that person then you are denying them some sort of civil right. I mean, everyone puts limits on marriage. If marriage had no definition, it wouldn't be anything. 

I think even most SSM proponents want to define marriage in such a way so that groups cannot marry and relatives can’t marry. Are those homosexual activists bigots when they advocate that marriage not include groups, relatives, or other parties?

I mean, I don’t think so. They are not violating anyone’s rights. And so, a conservative who wants to advocate that marriage not include same sex relationships are not violating anyone’s right either because they are defining marriage in accordance with the facts of nature…it’s not bigotry, it’s just biology. Frank Turk