I was listening to a sermon recently and the pastor made a
comment that caused a bit of concern (though I’m not sure this is the best
word). I have heard similar comments made before, and often, from different
churches and leaders. The pastor said something to the effect of, ‘I have seen
no good come from a theological debate. We should instead just love Jesus and
study the Word.’ He also mentioned that theological debate is divisive and can
lead to self righteousness.
I am trying to give him the benefit of the doubt, so I am
going to assume he doesn’t fully mean there is no value to debate since he also
mentioned that it is important to offer arguments to others. Maybe he meant
quarrelsome debate. However, I wanted to offer a few thoughts on his comments,
since it is one I have dealt with in the past. The challenge in this, ironically,
is to do it such a way as to avoid the label divisive or self righteous. I’ll
do my best.
1) Just because you
can see no value in something does not mean there is no value or that someone
else does not see the value.
I like
math and I think it is useful beyond simply answering the question in front of
you. It helps with critical thinking skills and more. Many folks do not see the
value, though it is there. For years, I did not like history; it took a long
time to see or appreciate the value in it.
While we may not always see the value in something, it does not mean the
value is not there.
2) Just because
someone does something poorly does not mean we ought not to engage in it.
Marriage, driving, parenting,
communication, relationships, loving God, loving others, preaching,
apologetics, debate, etc…Many folks completely mess up these things, myself included,
on a daily basis. This does not mean we ought to abandon them. Instead, we must
work on doing them well. Many folks come from a family of dysfunctional relationships
(who doesn’t? J)-
I still wanted to get married and have children. But I knew it was going to
take work to do it well. I knew there were certain things I did not want for my
relationship. So, I learned from folks that did it well and tried not to make
the same mistakes.
3) Unity does not mean
we always agree. Debating theology does not always mean being divisive just to
be divisive- put another way- Dividing
truth from error is not always bad.
Like it
or not good theology does divide. But sometimes our error will have worse results
than division. If I say I love Jesus, I need to be sure of a few things about
Him (ie…theology). If I am wrong about some of the details of who He is, this could
have eternal implications. Even if I just want to ‘love Jesus and study the
Word’. Mormons, some New Age folks, and others could say the same thing and
still not be a believer.
Just as
we must be careful not to treat ‘nonessentials’ as the most important thing, we
must also be careful not to think that if an issue is not explicitly the Gospel
that it is not important. Many issues have implications beyond the immediate,
but have some level of importance. (ex…baptism, church governance, methods of
evangelism, worship music, the sovereignty of God vs. man, Biblical
interpretation, etc)
On the
formal side of debate folks like Ravi Zacharius, Greg Koukl, William Lane
Craig, James White and many other godly men have participated in public debates
that have been very helpful, even if not for those directly involved. Koukl
calls the value in this- ricochet evangelism. What he means is that sometimes
we may never persuade the person we are talking to; sometimes those who may be “listening
in” may learn something valuable, even if it only to learn how to deal with
those we may disagree with. (I have found this can be the case with many online
interactions as well)
Debate, discussion (even heated), or thinking
deeply about controversial theological matters can be done well or poorly.
As I said above, I want to
give the pastor the benefit of the doubt. It may have just been a throw away
comment that was not clearly qualified, which is understandable. However, the American
Church has long neglected the intellectual life. And many Christians feel like
they can never bring up a contrary view for fear they could be, or have been, unfairly
labeled divisive. And just for questioning, discussing or debating important
issues about the God of the Bible.
God is
bigger than our doubts; He is bigger than our questions; He is bigger than when
we mess up. Thank the Lord. Even when we mess up our marriages, theological
discussions, and any other human interactions. Thank the Lord. He still saves
people in spite of us. Thank the Lord. The Gospel even covers us when we do
things poorly. Dare I say, thank the Lord? But it doesn’t always mean we ought
to give up those things. Strive, instead, to do them well.
No comments:
Post a Comment