Consider the Great Commission, with its
recursive or perpetual command to future generations of disciples:
Now the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed them. 17 And when they saw him they worshiped him, but some doubted. 18 And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.” (Matthew 23.16-20, ESV)
Without going as far as to insist that
the word “if” (as used below) either expresses or implicates the proposition that
something will occur only if such-and-such occurs (we’ve mentioned both Gricean nonconventional implicature and the lesson of John 21.20-24 in the past), think about how likely
or unlikely it is that one can be a disciple of Christ without
abiding in Christ’s word:
So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed in him, “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, 32 and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8.31-32, ESV)
Everyone who goes on ahead and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God. Whoever abides in the teaching has both the Father and the Son. (2 John 1.9, ESV)*
How does one fulfill the Great
Commission apart from the education, tutoring or mentoring of new
converts to Christianity? What are some possible means through which
it is ensured that disciples of Christ remain in the teaching and
word of Christ? Is it possible that Trinitarian apologetics has ever
been used either of God or of man to keep someone from straying into
Arianism or Oneness theology? Is it possible that counter-cultural
or counter-cult apologetics have at some moment had the effect of
some person’s remaining true to things such as monotheism, the
deity of Christ, inconvenient truths about capital punishment or
sexual ethics, the reality of hell, and the belief of and trust in
what God has said through his prophets and through the apostles of
Christ?
These are some things one should think
about if he or she as a Christian is ready to put any or all forms
of Christian apologetics on the back burner or out to the curb. Think about it further and you may discover that the various and numerous types of Christian apologetics are comparable to the preaching of the Law and Gospel in the degree to which they are important and have a place in the life of each and every Christian, each person already having his or her own strengths, interests and social connections which in many instances may call for one’s specializing in one of those types of apologetics.
_____________
* Note: practically everyone has “gone ahead” if one
will use the phrase in the idiosyncratic manner in which some guy
once used the following verse to declare to me that he knew all along, as it were, that I am not a Christian. After all, and for example, everyone has a naive belief about what
biblical personalities looked like: some think that Christ was Black,
others thinking he looked like “people from the Middle East,” others
having thought of Christ as being White, et cetera: only one group of
people here can posses a veridical belief on the matter since it is impossible in any serious sense to speak of someone as being phenotypically both Black and White, for example.
No comments:
Post a Comment